Gartner v. Winter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gartner v. Winter

270 So. 2d 470

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1972·No. No. 72-664·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal brought by Harold J. Gartner from an order of the trial court which denied appellant’s motion to intervene in a creditor’s action. The order entered by the court below will be affirmed because appellant seeks to relitigate in a subsequent suit between the same parties issues that have previously been determined in an earlier lawsuit. Field v. Field, Fla.1956, 91 So.2d 640; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 40, cert. den. 344 U.S. 878, 73 S.Ct. 165, 97 L.Ed. 680; Nelson v. Rever, Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 879; Bardwell v. Langston, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 742.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal brought by Harold J. Gartner from an order of the trial court which denied appellant’s motion to intervene in a creditor’s action. The order entered by the court below will be affirmed because appellant seeks to relitigate in a subsequent suit between the same parties issues that have previously been determined in an earlier lawsuit. Field v. Field, Fla.1956, 91 So.2d 640; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 40, cert. den. 344 U.S. 878, 73 S.Ct. 165, 97 L.Ed. 680; Nelson v. Rever, Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 879; Bardwell v. Langston, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 742.

Affirmed.

Gartner v. Winter, 270 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

270 So. 2d 470 (Gartner v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related