Gartner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided May 24, 2021·No. 17-1561·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Gunited States Court of Federal Claing

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: May 4, 2021

ee MATTHEW GARTNER, * as personal representative of the estate of * ANTHONY J. GARTNER, * UNPUBLISHED *k Petitioner, * No. 17-1561V *k V. * Special Master Gowen *k SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Influenza (Flu); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Anaphylaxis; Death. *k Respondent. * ee ee ee ee ee

Theodore G. Pashos, Pashos Law, LLC, St. Charles, MO, for petitioner. Zoe Wade, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION!

On October 19, 2017, Matthew Gartner (“petitioner”) as personal representative of the Estate of Anthony J. Gartner Jr. (‘decedent’) filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petition (ECF No. 1); see also Amended Petition filed January 19, 2021 (ECF No. 64). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to the decedent’s receipt on October 22, 2015, of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table’).

' Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Court’s website is at http:/Avww.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the opinion is posted on the Court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the Court with a proposed redacted version of the opinion. /d. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the Court’s website without any changes. Id.

> The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. The petition alleges that the decedent developed anaphylaxis following the administration of the flu vaccine, within the Table time period, and that his death on October 23, 2015, was a result of his alleged injury.

On May 4, 2021, respondent filed a stipulation which provides that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner on behalf of the decedent’s estate. Stipulation (ECF No. 69). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused the decedent’s alleged anaphylaxis, any other injury, or his death, and further denies that the decedent sustained a Table injury. /d. at J 6.

Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of the stipulation, which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Id. at ¥7.

The stipulation awards a lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, as legal representative of the Estate of Anthony J. Gartner, Jr. This lump sum represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the stipulation as the decision of the Court and hereby award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.?

IT ISSO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) MATTHEW GARTNER, ) as personal representative of the estateof ) ANTHONY J. GARTNER JR., ) ) No. 17-1561V ECF Petitioner, ) ) V. ) Special Master Gowen ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner, Matthew Gartner, as personal representative of the Estate of Anthony J. Gartner Jr. “decedent” or Mr. Gartner), filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to the decedent’s receipt of the influenza vaccine (“vaccine”), which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. On October 22, 2015, Mr. Gartner received the vaccine.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that Mr. Gartner developed anaphylaxis following the administration of the vaccine, within the Table time period, and that his death on October 23,

2015 was a result of his alleged injury. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of decedent’s alleged injuries and death.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccine caused the decedent’s alleged anaphylaxis, any other injury, or his death, and further denies that the decedent sustained a Table injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $50,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, as legal representative of the Estate of Anthony J. Gartner, Jr. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10, Payments made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gartner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Gartner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Gartner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a