Garten v. Garten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garten v. Garten

10 A.D.2d 632, 196 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 632 (Garten v. Garten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garten v. Garten, 10 A.D.2d 632, 196 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce, the appeal is from an order (1) granting respondent’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint on condition that there be delivered therewith “a stipulation consenting to the amendment of the order framing issues so as to include therein the issues as to the six additional acts of adultery set forth in the proposed amended complaint ”, and (2) granting-appellant’s cross motion for an additional counsel fee of $500. Order affirmed, without costs. The allowance of $500 as an additional counsel fee was adequate. We do not rule on the propriety of the court’s direction with respect to the framing of additional issues. This condition, of which respondent does not complain, was imposed as an intended benefit to appellant, who is not obligated to consent to the proposed framing of issues. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce, the appeal is from an order (1) granting respondent’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint on condition that there be delivered therewith “a stipulation consenting to the amendment of the order framing issues so as to include therein the issues as to the six additional acts of adultery set forth in the proposed amended complaint ”, and (2) granting-appellant’s cross motion for an additional counsel fee of $500. Order affirmed, without costs. The allowance of $500 as an additional counsel fee was adequate. We do not rule on the propriety of the court’s direction with respect to the framing of additional issues. This condition, of which respondent does not complain, was imposed as an intended benefit to appellant, who is not obligated to consent to the proposed framing of issues. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 632, 196 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garten-v-garten-nyappdiv-1960.