Garst Fruit Company, Inc. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Florida

Garst Fruit Company, Inc. v. Clark

144 So. 307, 107 Fla. 168

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 3, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Garst Fruit Company, Inc. v. Clark, 144 So. 307, 107 Fla. 168 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

144 So. 307 (Garst Fruit Company, Inc. v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.