Garson v. Rapping
This text of 489 N.E.2d 765 (Garson v. Rapping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[931]*931OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (105 AD2d 726). We add only that the cpurt properly applied the limited exception to the rule of strict compliance with the requirements of the Business Corporation Law (see, e.g., Matter of Rye Psychiatric Hosp. Center, 66 NY2d 333) recognized in Zion v Kurtz (50 NY2d 92, 102, rearg denied 50 NY2d 1060).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 N.E.2d 765, 66 N.Y.2d 928, 498 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garson-v-rapping-ny-1985.