Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance

152 Misc. 423, 273 N.Y.S. 492, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1498
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 7, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 Misc. 423 (Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance, 152 Misc. 423, 273 N.Y.S. 492, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There being issues of fact as to whether the policy was procured through fraud, it was error to award summary judgment in this action for the cancellation value. The statute (Insurance Law, § 122) gives no right of action based on a policy procured through fraud.

Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, motion for summary judgment denied, and motion to consolidate actions granted.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Middlesex Mutual Fire Insurance
259 A.D. 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 Misc. 423, 273 N.Y.S. 492, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrow-v-lincoln-fire-insurance-nyappterm-1934.