Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.

48 A.D.2d 814, 370 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10015

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 814 (Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc., 48 A.D.2d 814, 370 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 18, 1975, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Capozzoli, J. (dissenting). I doubt very much that, when the contract was entered into between these parties, either of them had any thought that the arbitrators would be authorized to punish either party for a breach of the contract in any way, other than to award such damages as reasonably flow directly from a breach. I believe that the sound approach to the question presented in this record is to hold that, since the arbitration agreement in question makes no provision for punitive damages and since no such provision can logically be read into the terms thereof by implication, the arbitrators exceeded their power where they nevertheless made an award of punitive damages. (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par [iii]; Matter of Publishers’ Assn. [Newspaper Union], 280 App Div 500.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 18, 1975, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Capozzoli, J. (dissenting). I doubt very much that, when the contract was entered into between these parties, either of them had any thought that the arbitrators would be authorized to punish either party for a breach of the contract in any way, other than to award such damages as reasonably flow directly from a breach. I believe that the sound approach to the question presented in this record is to hold that, since the arbitration agreement in question makes no provision for punitive damages and since no such provision can logically be read into the terms thereof by implication, the arbitrators exceeded their power where they nevertheless made an award of punitive damages. (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par [iii]; Matter of Publishers’ Assn. [Newspaper Union], 280 App Div 500.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 814, 370 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrity-v-lyle-stuart-inc-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack