Garrity v. Bash

84 Ill. 73
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 Ill. 73 (Garrity v. Bash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrity v. Bash, 84 Ill. 73 (Ill. 1876).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

When defendant perfected his appeal, it was his du.ty to cause the papers in the case to be deposited in the office of the clerk of the circuit court, and advance such fees as are required by statute to be prepaid. That, he neglected to do. On service of notice, a rule was entered against him to refund, instanter, “ appeal fees ” advanced by plaintiff. Failing to appear and show cause against such rule, the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, as it might well do, dismissed defendant’s appeal.' It does not appear, by affidavit or otherwise, defendant had any defense to the action, and his appeal was properly dismissed for non-compliance with the rule to refund costs advanced.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newby v. Yellin
257 Ill. App. 526 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)
Layman v. Detharding
106 Ill. App. 594 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Ill. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrity-v-bash-ill-1876.