Garrison v. Thomas

Fourth Circuit

Garrison v. Thomas

35 F. App'x 376

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2002·No. No. 02-6503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Keith Garrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Garrison v. Thomas, No. CA-01-816 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 11, 2002; entered Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Keith Garrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Garrison v. Thomas, No. CA-01-816 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 11, 2002; entered Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Garrison v. Thomas, 35 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

35 F. App'x 376 (Garrison v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related