Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association
This text of 119 N.E. 1076 (Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was for libel. A verdict was found by the jury for the plaintiff. This the trial judge set aside and directed a new trial. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed this order and reinstated the verdict. Thereupon the judgment was entered and an appeal was taken from it directly to this court. So far as the form of the appeal is concerned it is correct. (Code Civ. Pro. sec. 1336; Girling v. City of New York, 197 N. Y. 302.) The difficulty is that this is an action for personal injuries. The judgment based on the verdict of the jury has been unanimously affirmed. As the Code stood at the time the appeal was taken, it did not lie unless upon compliance with subdivision 2 of section 191. In Girling v. City of New York the Appellate Division was not unanimous. (Charles v. Leonard, 215 N. Y. 712.)
The appeal should be dismissed; with costs.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not sitting.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 N.E. 1076, 222 N.Y. 691, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-sun-printing-and-publishing-association-ny-1918.