Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association

New York Court of Appeals

Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association

119 N.E. 1076, 222 N.Y. 691, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1578

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 12, 1918·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action was for libel. A verdict was found by the jury for the plaintiff. This the trial judge set aside and directed a new trial. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed this order and reinstated the verdict. Thereupon the judgment was entered and an appeal was taken from it directly to this court. So far as the form of the appeal is concerned it is correct. (Code Civ. Pro. sec. 1336; Girling v. City of New York, 197 N. Y. 302.) The difficulty is that this is an action for personal injuries. The judgment based on the verdict of the jury has been unanimously affirmed. As the Code stood at the time the appeal was taken, it did not lie unless upon compliance with subdivision 2 of section 191. In Girling v. City of New York the Appellate Division was not unanimous. (Charles v. Leonard, 215 N. Y. 712.)

The appeal should be dismissed; with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not sitting.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The action was for libel. A verdict was found by the jury for the plaintiff. This the trial judge set aside and directed a new trial. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed this order and reinstated the verdict. Thereupon the judgment was entered and an appeal was taken from it directly to this court. So far as the form of the appeal is concerned it is correct. (Code Civ. Pro. sec. 1336; Girling v. City of New York, 197 N. Y. 302.) The difficulty is that this is an action for personal injuries. The judgment based on the verdict of the jury has been unanimously affirmed. As the Code stood at the time the appeal was taken, it did not lie unless upon compliance with subdivision 2 of section 191. In Girling v. City of New York the Appellate Division was not unanimous. (Charles v. Leonard, 215 N. Y. 712.)

The appeal should be dismissed; with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not sitting.

Appeal dismissed.

Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association, 119 N.E. 1076, 222 N.Y. 691, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1578 (N.Y. 1918).

Pincite

119 N.E. 1076 (Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related