Garrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Garrison v. State

170 S.E. 95, 47 Ga. App. 192, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 339

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 7, 1933

Docket23174

StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.E. 95 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. State, 170 S.E. 95, 47 Ga. App. 192, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. The evidence demanded the verdict finding the accused guilty of adultery and fornication.

2. The special assignment of error is without merit. The State abandoned its prosecution for seduction and insisted only on the charge of adultery and fornication. The remark of the trial judge which is complained of might have been harmful in a trial for seduction, but it was harmless in the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

1. The evidence demanded the verdict finding the accused guilty of adultery and fornication.

2. The special assignment of error is without merit. The State abandoned its prosecution for seduction and insisted only on the charge of adultery and fornication. The remark of the trial judge which is complained of might have been harmful in a trial for seduction, but it was harmless in the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.E. 95, 47 Ga. App. 192, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-gactapp-1933.