Garrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Garrison v. State

86 S.E. 743, 17 Ga. App. 314, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 373

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 26, 1915

Docket6786

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 743 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. State, 86 S.E. 743, 17 Ga. App. 314, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 373 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The first, second, and fourth grounds of the amended motion for a new trial are without merit, as the alleged errors complained of therein are not specifically pointed out: Civil Code, § 6142; Chatman v. State, 8 Ga. App. 842 (70 S. E. 188); Robinson v. Rothchilds, 10 Ga. App. 237 (73 S. E. 554); Jones v. State, 135 Ga. 357 (6), 358 (69 S. E. 527).

[315]*315Decided October 26, 1915.

Accusation of carrying concealed weapon; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Wheeler presiding. June 14, 1915.

A. C. Brown, W. M. Smith, for plaintiff in error. P. Gooley, solicitor, contra.

2. Under the charge of the court as given, and in the absence of an appropriate request, there was no error in the omission complained of in the 3rd ground of the amended motion.

3. The court did not err, in the absence of a timely written request, in omitting to charge the law as to the impeachment and credibility of witnesses, as complained of in the 5th ground of the amended motion. Shropshire v. State, 15 Ga. App. 345 (3) (83 S. E. 152), and cases therein cited.

4. The evidence, while weak, was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI