Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Garrison v. State

Garrison v. State

590 So. 2d 23, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11926, 1991 WL 248630
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garrison v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 553 So. 2d 1377 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 1991·No. No. 89-01430·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer and obstructing an officer with violence are affirmed. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to continue the trial because a defense witness did not appear as expected. The witness had not been subpoenaed. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 936, 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrison v. State, 590 So. 2d 23, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11926, 1991 WL 248630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

590 So. 2d 23 (Garrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
438 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)