Garrison v. State
This text of 338 So. 2d 70 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was found guilty of robbery by a jury, adjudged guilty and sentenced. On appeal, he urges that error was committed when the trial judge denied his “Motion to Suppress Lineup, Showup, Photograph, Other Pre-Trial Confrontation, and Courtroom Identification of the Defendant.” A review of the record shows that the identification of the defendant was clear and positive. It meets the test set forth in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 98 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). The judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Glas v. State, 329 So.2d 341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.