Garrison v. State

338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15572
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1052
StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 70 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrison v. State, 338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty of robbery by a jury, adjudged guilty and sentenced. On appeal, he urges that error was committed when the trial judge denied his “Motion to Suppress Lineup, Showup, Photograph, Other Pre-Trial Confrontation, and Courtroom Identification of the Defendant.” A review of the record shows that the identification of the defendant was clear and positive. It meets the test set forth in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 98 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). The judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Glas v. State, 329 So.2d 341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neil v. Biggers
409 U.S. 188 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Glas v. State
329 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.