Garrison v. State

515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 21, 1974·No. CR 74-101·Published

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant David Garrison’s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrison v. State, 515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325 (Ark. 1974).

515 S.W.2d 222 (Garrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. United States
385 U.S. 206 (Supreme Court, 1967)