Garrison v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Garrison v. State

515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 21, 1974

DocketCR 74-101

StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.W.2d 222 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. State, 515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325 (Ark. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant David Garrison’s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant David Garrison’s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-ark-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack