Garrison v. State
515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325
Opinion
Appellant David Garrison’s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrison v. State, 515 S.W.2d 222, 257 Ark. 138, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325 (Ark. 1974).
515 S.W.2d 222 (Garrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. United States
385 U.S. 206 (Supreme Court, 1967)