Garrison v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Garrison v. State

135 So. 921, 24 Ala. App. 637

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 1931

Docket8 Div. 407.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 921 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. State, 135 So. 921, 24 Ala. App. 637 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It would serve no good purpose to set out the evidence in this case. The contention of the state was that defendant sold one pint of whisky to a witness named Tyra. Tyra testified that the sale was made by a man named Johnson, whom defendant told to get the whisky and sell to witness. We have read this evidence en banc, and find it sufficient to sustain a conviction. We would not be justified in setting aside the verdict on the defendant’s motion.

There is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

It would serve no good purpose to set out the evidence in this case. The contention of the state was that defendant sold one pint of whisky to a witness named Tyra. Tyra testified that the sale was made by a man named Johnson, whom defendant told to get the whisky and sell to witness. We have read this evidence en banc, and find it sufficient to sustain a conviction. We would not be justified in setting aside the verdict on the defendant’s motion.

There is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 921, 24 Ala. App. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-alactapp-1931.