Garrison v. State

135 So. 921, 24 Ala. App. 637

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It would serve no good purpose to set out the evidence in this case. The contention of the state was that defendant sold one pint of whisky to a witness named Tyra. Tyra testified that the sale was made by a man named Johnson, whom defendant told to get the whisky and sell to witness. We have read this evidence en banc, and find it sufficient to sustain a conviction. We would not be justified in setting aside the verdict on the defendant’s motion.

There is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.