Garrison v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Garrison v. State

109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 671

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1926

Docket6 Div. 915.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 So. 924 (Garrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. State, 109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully being.in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. The evidence was ample to support the verdict returned. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony were based on rulings involving only the simplest principles of law. In none of these rulings was there prejudicial error. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully being.in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. The evidence was ample to support the verdict returned. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony were based on rulings involving only the simplest principles of law. In none of these rulings was there prejudicial error. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack