Garrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided June 21, 2021·No. 19-541·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0541V UNPUBLISHED

GEORGE GARRISON, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: May 19, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On April 12, 2019, George Garrison filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received on October 12, 2016. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at May 18, 2021, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months. Petition at 1; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury and denies that the flu immunization is the cause of petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury or condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on May 18, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $36,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 J

INT.BE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

GEORGE GARRISON,

Petitioner,

v. No. 19-0S41V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Peritimer filed a petition for vaccine compensaoon under the Nati>nal Vaccine Injury

Compemation Program, 42 U.S.C.§300aa-101o 34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition

seeks compensation for injuriDs allegedly related to petitioner's rece.,t of the in&onm («flu")

vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. §

100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vacciaatbl on or about October 12, 2016.

3. The vaccine was adminmtered with.in the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine admirustration

('-SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, and that his alleged

shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. He further alleges that he experienced the resilual

effects of this condition for more than six months.

1 S. Petitioner represents that there bas been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his conditi>n.

6. Respondent denies that petitmer sustained a SIRVA Table injury and denies that the

flu immunization is the cause of petitiooer•s alleged shoulder iqjury, or any other i\jury or

condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

__ _ _issues between them shall be settled and that a decsion should be entered awarding the . - . ·- compensation described in paragraph 8 of tbis Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgmem reflecting a decii;ion consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner bas filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Heakh and Human Services wiD issue

the foDowiJg vaccine compensati>n payment:

A lump sum of $36,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Tim amount represents eompcnsation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in tbs case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U..S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l). and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon tbs

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identmed to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program s not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(g), including State compensaaon programs, insurance policies,

2 Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act(42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health sem:es on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 ofthis Stipulation, and any amount awarded

pursuant to paragraph 9, will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the

availability of suffkient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorney's fees and Jitiption costs, and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Garrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Garrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-101o
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-101o
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-1S
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a