Garrison v. Ringland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Garrison v. Ringland

73 Mo. App. 631, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 131

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

Bland, P. J.

This is a companion case with number 6949, wherein Martha A. G-arrison is plaintiff, and Wayne O’Donald et al. are defendants, decided at the present term. This suit is to recover the $500 note mentioned in the answer of the O’Donalds in number 6949. The evidence in this case is the same as in the O’Donald case, except the deposition of the plaintiff was taken and read in this case, from which it appears that Sheppard had express authority to make the contract of novation pleaded in this, as it was in the O’Donald case. For the reasons stated in the O’Donald case, the judgment in this caséis affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bland, P. J.

This is a companion case with number 6949, wherein Martha A. G-arrison is plaintiff, and Wayne O’Donald et al. are defendants, decided at the present term. This suit is to recover the $500 note mentioned in the answer of the O’Donalds in number 6949. The evidence in this case is the same as in the O’Donald case, except the deposition of the plaintiff was taken and read in this case, from which it appears that Sheppard had express authority to make the contract of novation pleaded in this, as it was in the O’Donald case. For the reasons stated in the O’Donald case, the judgment in this caséis affirmed.

All concur.

Garrison v. Ringland, 73 Mo. App. 631, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 131 (Mo. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

73 Mo. App. 631 (Garrison v. Ringland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.