Garrison v. Paul
1 Pennyp. 380
Opinion
It is certainly well-settled law that a defendant’s right to a set-off must be perfect at the time the suit is instituted. We know of no doctrine of equitable set-off which dispenses with this rule. A surety has an action against his principal before being actually compelled to pay the money, because he could file a bill in equity for indemnity. But there can be no action for contribution between co-sureties, either at law or in equity, until the surety is obliged to pay the debt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrison v. Paul, 1 Pennyp. 380 (Pa. 1881).
1 Pennyp. 380 (Garrison v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Condran v. Kennedy
56 Pa. Super. 356 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Pocono Spring Water Ice Co. v. American Ice Co.
64 A. 398 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)