Garrison v. Heckler

W.D. Missouri

Garrison v. Heckler

580 F. Supp. 520, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661, 4 Soc. Serv. Rev. 662

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri

DecidedFebruary 8, 1984

DocketNo. 83-0907-CV-W-3

StatusPublished

This text of 580 F. Supp. 520 (Garrison v. Heckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. Heckler, 580 F. Supp. 520, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661, 4 Soc. Serv. Rev. 662 (W.D. Mo. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.

Defendant moves the Court to remand this action to the Secretary for locating or reconstructing the claims file and appeal file. Plaintiff opposes the open ended nature of the remand sought.

The Court agrees with the plaintiff. Plaintiff commenced his appeal on August 8, 1983. The Secretary was granted an extension of time in which to respond on October 17, 1983, November 15, 1983, and December 15,1983. On none of those occasions was the Court informed that the files were incomplete or lost. The Court recognizes that in order to proceed this case must be remanded, however, due to the circumstances of the case an unstructured remand is unwarranted. The Court will direct the Secretary to process the case within a time certain.

If an additional hearing is required or counsel for plaintiff is required to duplicate work he has already done in order to aid the Secretary in reconstructing the file, then the Court will be open to considering ways to remove these costs from the plaintiff. Plaintiff should not be required to pay additional attorneys fees because of the mistake of the Secretary in processing his case.

Accordingly, the Court

ORDERS the Secretary to either locate or reconstruct the files of the plaintiff and provide this Court with the appropriate record for review within sixty (60) days of February 10, 1984.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.

Defendant moves the Court to remand this action to the Secretary for locating or reconstructing the claims file and appeal file. Plaintiff opposes the open ended nature of the remand sought.

The Court agrees with the plaintiff. Plaintiff commenced his appeal on August 8, 1983. The Secretary was granted an extension of time in which to respond on October 17, 1983, November 15, 1983, and December 15,1983. On none of those occasions was the Court informed that the files were incomplete or lost. The Court recognizes that in order to proceed this case must be remanded, however, due to the circumstances of the case an unstructured remand is unwarranted. The Court will direct the Secretary to process the case within a time certain.

If an additional hearing is required or counsel for plaintiff is required to duplicate work he has already done in order to aid the Secretary in reconstructing the file, then the Court will be open to considering ways to remove these costs from the plaintiff. Plaintiff should not be required to pay additional attorneys fees because of the mistake of the Secretary in processing his case.

Accordingly, the Court

ORDERS the Secretary to either locate or reconstruct the files of the plaintiff and provide this Court with the appropriate record for review within sixty (60) days of February 10, 1984.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 F. Supp. 520, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19661, 4 Soc. Serv. Rev. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-heckler-mowd-1984.