Garrison v. . Grigsby
This text of 140 S.E. 925 (Garrison v. . Grigsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury, tried upon the following issues: *Page 823
"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.
"2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injuries, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No.
"3. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of a fellow-servant, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No.
"4. What damages is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $2,000."
Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal. There is no exceptive assignment of error appearing on the record which requires, or would warrant, any interference with the verdict and judgment rendered in the Superior Court. They will, therefore, be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 925, 194 N.C. 822, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-grigsby-nc-1927.