Garrio v. Temo Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garrio v. Temo Sales, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 201, 716 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 201 (Garrio v. Temo Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrio v. Temo Sales, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 201, 716 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kyle Shaw and RMS Freight Systems, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered November 26, 1999, which, upon granting the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate an order of the same court entered July 27, 1999, granting their motion to change the venue of the action from the Supreme Court, Queens County, to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, upon his default in opposing their motion, denied the motion to change the venue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants failed to establish their entitlement to change the venue of this action from Queens County to Westchester County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kyle Shaw and RMS Freight Systems, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered November 26, 1999, which, upon granting the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to vacate an order of the same court entered July 27, 1999, granting their motion to change the venue of the action from the Supreme Court, Queens County, to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, upon his default in opposing their motion, denied the motion to change the venue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants failed to establish their entitlement to change the venue of this action from Queens County to Westchester County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 201, 716 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrio-v-temo-sales-inc-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack