Garrido v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

64 So. 3d 722, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8039, 2011 WL 2135458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 2011·No. No. 3D10-2326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The motion to set aside the summary judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 was a fact-specific question, see LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, N.A., 826 So.2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), which was resolved against the appellant, who has not provided us with a transcript. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrido v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 64 So. 3d 722, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8039, 2011 WL 2135458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

64 So. 3d 722 (Garrido v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, NA
826 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)