Garrido v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrido v. State

47 So. 3d 341, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15808, 2010 WL 4103077

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 2010

Docket4D08-4613

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 So. 3d 341 (Garrido v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrido v. State, 47 So. 3d 341, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15808, 2010 WL 4103077 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 So. 3d 341, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15808, 2010 WL 4103077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrido-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack