Garrido v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrido v. State

47 So. 3d 341, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15808, 2010 WL 4103077

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 2010·No. 4D08-4613·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

Garrido v. State, 47 So. 3d 341, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15808, 2010 WL 4103077 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

47 So. 3d 341 (Garrido v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related