Garrido v. Burger King Corp.
605 So. 2d 1026, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11067, 1992 WL 296035
Opinion
The record reflects the existence of a material question of fact relating to the “novelty” issue, and accordingly, the trial court was in error in granting the appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment. See [1027] Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 438 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). As a result thereof, the summary judgment entered by the trial court must be reversed, with this cause thereafter proceeding to trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrido v. Burger King Corp., 605 So. 2d 1026, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11067, 1992 WL 296035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
605 So. 2d 1026 (Garrido v. Burger King Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Metro. Dade County
438 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)