Garrick v. Chamberlain

Illinois Supreme Court

Garrick v. Chamberlain

100 Ill. 476

Illinois Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Scott, J.:

There is nothing in the rules, or in any practice that has ever prevailed in this court, that would authorize a second petition by the same paity for a rehearing. A majority of the court are therefore of opinion that the motion made to strike what purports to be a second petition for a rehearing from the files, should be allowed, and it is accordingly done.

Petition stricken from the files.

Dickey, Ch. J.: I do not concur in the opinion of the majority of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott, J.:

There is nothing in the rules, or in any practice that has ever prevailed in this court, that would authorize a second petition by the same paity for a rehearing. A majority of the court are therefore of opinion that the motion made to strike what purports to be a second petition for a rehearing from the files, should be allowed, and it is accordingly done.

Petition stricken from the files.

Dickey, Ch. J.: I do not concur in the opinion of the majority of the court.

Garrick v. Chamberlain, 100 Ill. 476 (Ill. 1881).

Pincite

100 Ill. 476 (Garrick v. Chamberlain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related