Garrick v. Chamberlain

Illinois Supreme Court

Garrick v. Chamberlain

100 Ill. 476

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 100 Ill. 476 (Garrick v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrick v. Chamberlain, 100 Ill. 476 (Ill. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Scott, J.:

There is nothing in the rules, or in any practice that has ever prevailed in this court, that would authorize a second petition by the same paity for a rehearing. A majority of the court are therefore of opinion that the motion made to strike what purports to be a second petition for a rehearing from the files, should be allowed, and it is accordingly done.

Petition stricken from the files.

Dickey, Ch. J.: I do not concur in the opinion of the majority of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott, J.:

There is nothing in the rules, or in any practice that has ever prevailed in this court, that would authorize a second petition by the same paity for a rehearing. A majority of the court are therefore of opinion that the motion made to strike what purports to be a second petition for a rehearing from the files, should be allowed, and it is accordingly done.

Petition stricken from the files.

Dickey, Ch. J.: I do not concur in the opinion of the majority of the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 Ill. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrick-v-chamberlain-ill-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack