Garrick Haughton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrick Haughton v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 2014

Docket4D13-530 and 4D13-531

StatusPublished

This text of Garrick Haughton v. State (Garrick Haughton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrick Haughton v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GARRICK HAUGHTON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D13-530 and 4D13-531

[December 10, 2014]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502012CF009781A and 502008CF009036A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s adjudications and sentences in these two consolidated appeals presented under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), but remand for the trial court to enter a written order which specifies the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated in lower court case number 502008CF009036A. See Turner v. State, 84 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Petrie v. State, 980 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Appellant need not be present.

Affirmed but remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI