Garrett v. Williams & McCollister

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Garrett v. Williams & McCollister

93 S.E. 231, 20 Ga. App. 738, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1062

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 3, 1917

Docket8758

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 231 (Garrett v. Williams & McCollister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrett v. Williams & McCollister, 93 S.E. 231, 20 Ga. App. 738, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1062 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

This was a proceeding brought by the sheriff of Carroll county for the purpose of obtaining direction by a rule for the distribution of money in his hands, arising from a sale under a mortgage fi. fa. in favor of Williams & McCollister against Milton Barker, the fund [739]*739being claimed by other fi. fas. placed in the sheriff’s hands. Under all the facts of the case it does not appear that the court, sitting without the intervention of a jury, erred in holding that the claim of Williams & McCollister was entitled to be first satisfied out of the fund, and that the balance, if any, should be paid to the Peoples Bank.

Decided August 3, 1917.

Money rule; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. February 15, 1917.

Tí. D. Jackson, for plaintiffs in error. Buford Boykin, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

This was a proceeding brought by the sheriff of Carroll county for the purpose of obtaining direction by a rule for the distribution of money in his hands, arising from a sale under a mortgage fi. fa. in favor of Williams & McCollister against Milton Barker, the fund [739]*739being claimed by other fi. fas. placed in the sheriff’s hands. Under all the facts of the case it does not appear that the court, sitting without the intervention of a jury, erred in holding that the claim of Williams & McCollister was entitled to be first satisfied out of the fund, and that the balance, if any, should be paid to the Peoples Bank.

Decided August 3, 1917.

Money rule; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. February 15, 1917.

Tí. D. Jackson, for plaintiffs in error. Buford Boykin, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E. 231, 20 Ga. App. 738, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-williams-mccollister-gactapp-1917.