Garrett v. United States

Supreme Court

Garrett v. United States

369 U.S. 662, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 274, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1276

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 14, 1962·No. 773 M·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Garrett v. United States, 369 U.S. 662, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 274, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1276 (1962).

Pincite

369 U.S. 662 (Garrett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related