Garrett v. Sycuan Casino

District Court, S.D. California·Decided August 13, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-01296·Unknown

Opinion

fa >>

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

William Allen Garrett Civil Action No. 24-cv-1296-JES-SBC

Plaintiff, V. Sycuan Casino; Slot Machine Supervisor; CLERK'S JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CA Security et al

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court Dismisses with prejudice Garrett’s Complaint in its entirety based on his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1); and the Court finds amendment would be futile. See Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood, 759 F.3d 1112, 1116 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of ... leave to amend.’”’) (quoting Bonin v. Calderon, 59 F.3d 815, 845 (9th Cir. 1995)). The case is hereby closed.

Date: 8/13/24 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ M. Quinata M. Quinata, Deputy

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrett v. Sycuan Casino, (S.D. Cal. 2024).

Garrett v. Sycuan Casino (Garrett v. Sycuan Casino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related