Garrett v. Sycuan Casino
This text of Garrett v. Sycuan Casino (Garrett v. Sycuan Casino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
fa >>
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
William Allen Garrett Civil Action No. 24-cv-1296-JES-SBC
Plaintiff, V. Sycuan Casino; Slot Machine Supervisor; CLERK'S JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CA Security et al
Defendant.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court Dismisses with prejudice Garrett’s Complaint in its entirety based on his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1); and the Court finds amendment would be futile. See Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood, 759 F.3d 1112, 1116 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of ... leave to amend.’”’) (quoting Bonin v. Calderon, 59 F.3d 815, 845 (9th Cir. 1995)). The case is hereby closed.
Date: 8/13/24 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ M. Quinata M. Quinata, Deputy
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garrett v. Sycuan Casino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-sycuan-casino-casd-2024.