Garrett v. State

20 S.W.2d 201, 113 Tex. Crim. 273, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 622
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garrett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Tex. Crim. 71
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1929·No. No. 11881.·Published

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is fraudulently receiving stolen.property; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The term of court at which appellant was tried adjourned on the 28th day of January, 1928. Bills of exception found in the record were not filed until April 25th, 1928. No order extending the time for filing the bills of exception was entered. Under the provisions of Article 760 C. C. P. the bills were filed too late, and the state’s motion to strike said bills from the record must be sustained.

We are of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrett v. State, 20 S.W.2d 201, 113 Tex. Crim. 273, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 622 (Tex. 1929).

20 S.W.2d 201 (Garrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. State
251 S.W. 811 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Mitchell v. State
10 S.W.2d 87 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Kelly v. State
17 S.W.2d 460 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Lopez v. State
17 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)