Garrett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrett v. State

963 So. 2d 960, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 2007 WL 2509841

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 7, 2007

DocketNo. 5D06-3002

StatusPublished

This text of 963 So. 2d 960 (Garrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrett v. State, 963 So. 2d 960, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 2007 WL 2509841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jarvis Garrett, argues that he was sentenced on the basis of an inaccurate scoresheet. While we are unable to determine from the record before us whether or not the scoresheet utilized by the trial court was accurate, we are able to determine that even if it was inaccurate in the manner suggested by Mr. Garrett, it would have made no difference in the sentence he received. We note that he was sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement which made no mention of the sentence being associated with the scoresheet. Nevertheless, appellant is entitled to have an accurate scoresheet. Thus, while we affirm the order denying relief, we remand for the trial court to determine whether the scoresheet is accurate.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jarvis Garrett, argues that he was sentenced on the basis of an inaccurate scoresheet. While we are unable to determine from the record before us whether or not the scoresheet utilized by the trial court was accurate, we are able to determine that even if it was inaccurate in the manner suggested by Mr. Garrett, it would have made no difference in the sentence he received. We note that he was sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement which made no mention of the sentence being associated with the scoresheet. Nevertheless, appellant is entitled to have an accurate scoresheet. Thus, while we affirm the order denying relief, we remand for the trial court to determine whether the scoresheet is accurate.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 So. 2d 960, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 2007 WL 2509841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.