Garrett v. State
759 So. 2d 752, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7246, 2000 WL 768070
Opinion
Because the trial court did not have the benefit of the supreme court’s recent ruling in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), it summarily denied appellant’s Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis on his 1994 conviction, as untimely. Appellant sought review based on his claimed recent discovery of adverse INS proceedings (deportation), alleging the trial court did not advise him of the possibility of such consequences. Under Peart, the petition is timely, and so we reverse and remand for further hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrett v. State, 759 So. 2d 752, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7246, 2000 WL 768070 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
759 So. 2d 752 (Garrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peart v. State
756 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)