Garrett v. State Ex Rel. Cuninghame

100 So. 855, 211 Ala. 442, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 596
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 12, 1924
Docket1 Div. 263.
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 855 (Garrett v. State Ex Rel. Cuninghame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrett v. State Ex Rel. Cuninghame, 100 So. 855, 211 Ala. 442, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 596 (Ala. 1924).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The announcements contained in Coma Garrett, Jr., v. James G. Ouninghame (Ala. Sup.) 100 South. 845, 1 are to the effect that the circuit judge committed error in rulings on demurrer to answer and special pleas *443 indicated in that opinion, and -in granting the writ.

The two cases are submitted together. However, this judgment is reversed and one here entered declining the writ.

Appellee is taxed with the costs of this appeal.

Reversed and rendered, writ denied, and petition dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 430.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrett v. Cuninghame
100 So. 845 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 855, 211 Ala. 442, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-state-ex-rel-cuninghame-ala-1924.