Garrett v. State
861 S.W.2d 114, 314 Ark. 225, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garrett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 314 Ark. 470 →
Opinion
Lawrence Charles Garrett, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.
However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Lawrence Charles Garrett will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrett v. State, 861 S.W.2d 114, 314 Ark. 225, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 490 (Ark. 1993).
861 S.W.2d 114 (Garrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.