Garrett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Garrett v. State

106 So. 916, 21 Ala. App. 671

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1926

Docket7 Div. 152.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 916 (Garrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrett v. State, 106 So. 916, 21 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by distilling, etc., liquors, a part of which was alcohol. The case is merely “e pluribus unum.” There is nothing new or novel involved. The evidence was ample to support the conviction. There is no merit in the single exception reserved upon the taking of testimony in the case. The oral charge of the court was free from error. The record is regular. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by distilling, etc., liquors, a part of which was alcohol. The case is merely “e pluribus unum.” There is nothing new or novel involved. The evidence was ample to support the conviction. There is no merit in the single exception reserved upon the taking of testimony in the case. The oral charge of the court was free from error. The record is regular. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 916, 21 Ala. App. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-state-alactapp-1926.