Garrett v. Rogers

48 Tenn. 321
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 48 Tenn. 321 (Garrett v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrett v. Rogers, 48 Tenn. 321 (Tenn. 1870).

Opinion

Tüeítey, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The objection made to the record that the bill of exceptions is not signed by the Circuit Judge, is fatal. To hold otherwise, would be to open wide a door to confusion and fraud, and to invite unscrupulous parties to flood the dockets of this Court with unidentified and unauthenticated files purporting to be records. The truth of the case being fairly stated in the bill of exceptions, the Judge shall sign the same, which thereupon becomes a part of the record in the cause. Code, 2968.

“A bill of exceptions to become a part of the record, must be made up and signed by the Judge at the term in which the trial is had.” McGavock v. Puryear, 6 Cold., 34.

This rule is sound in principle, and although it may ■'Operate thardly, and with seeming harshness in this case, in which the bill of exceptions is not signed at all, and in which the failure .to have it signed is the result of oversight, yet we cannot infringe a rule so important and necessary in practice, and so vital to the interests of litigants'.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. John A. Denies Sons Co.
404 S.W.2d 580 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1966)
Norris v. Richards
320 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1958)
McAmis v. Carlisle
300 S.W.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1956)
Bales v. Bales
188 S.W.2d 601 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Tenn. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-rogers-tenn-1870.