Garrett v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrett v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.

869 So. 2d 1263, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2004 WL 784551

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-177

StatusPublished

This text of 869 So. 2d 1263 (Garrett v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrett v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc., 869 So. 2d 1263, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2004 WL 784551 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See and compare Benjamin v. Biel, 831 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Barbour v. Brinker Fla., Inc., 801 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Barton Protective Servs., Inc. v. Faber, 745 So.2d 968 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Joseph F. Maimone Sec. and Investigations, Inc. v. American Exp. Travel Related Servs., 598 So.2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shilling, 374 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See and compare Benjamin v. Biel, 831 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Barbour v. Brinker Fla., Inc., 801 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Barton Protective Servs., Inc. v. Faber, 745 So.2d 968 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Joseph F. Maimone Sec. and Investigations, Inc. v. American Exp. Travel Related Servs., 598 So.2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shilling, 374 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 So. 2d 1263, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2004 WL 784551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-kuehne-nagel-inc-fladistctapp-2004.