Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co.

191 S.E. 510, 211 N.C. 746, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 9, 1937·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The record discloses no fatal exceptive assignment of error. The allegation of negligence is, perhaps, narrowly stated, but its sufficiency is not challenged. Indeed, the theory of the trial may have been more favorable to the defendant than the facts in evidence warranted. However, the jury has answered for the plaintiff. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co., 191 S.E. 510, 211 N.C. 746, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 213 (N.C. 1937).

191 S.E. 510 (Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.