Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co.

191 S.E. 510, 211 N.C. 746, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 213

DecidedJune 9, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.E. 510 (Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrett v. Holland Furnace Co., 191 S.E. 510, 211 N.C. 746, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 213 (N.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The record discloses no fatal exceptive assignment of error. The allegation of negligence is, perhaps, narrowly stated, but its sufficiency is not challenged. Indeed, the theory of the trial may have been more favorable to the defendant than the facts in evidence warranted. However, the jury has answered for the plaintiff. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The record discloses no fatal exceptive assignment of error. The allegation of negligence is, perhaps, narrowly stated, but its sufficiency is not challenged. Indeed, the theory of the trial may have been more favorable to the defendant than the facts in evidence warranted. However, the jury has answered for the plaintiff. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E. 510, 211 N.C. 746, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-holland-furnace-co-nc-1937.