Garrett v. Felt

32 Miss. 137
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 32 Miss. 137 (Garrett v. Felt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrett v. Felt, 32 Miss. 137 (Mich. 1856).

Opinion

Fishee,, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only error alleged to exist in the record, is that the jury were sworn to try the issue joined between the parties, when in fact no issue appears to have been joined. This is at most but a clerical error. It is not the practice except in a few specified cases to swear the jury to try the issue joined in a particular case. They are sworn to try all issues, and to execute all writs of inquiry which may be submitted to them during the week for which they have been summoned; and we must therefore presume that the jury were sworn in this manner unless there is a showing by the record to the contrary. The verdict and judgment being in substance the same which the court would have rendered if judgment by default had been entered, the judgment will not be reversed merely for this clerical error. It is not an error to the party’s prejudice, and he cannot therefore complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Johnson
53 Miss. 94 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)
Pool v. Hill
44 Miss. 306 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
Naron v. Gwin
43 Miss. 346 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
Hewett v. O. P. Cobb & Co.
40 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Miss. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-felt-miss-1856.