Garrett v. Collier
This text of Garrett v. Collier (Garrett v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7157
ROBERT W. GARRETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH E. COLLIER, Investigator for Edgefield County Sheriff’s Department; MIKE V. GOODMAN, Investigator for Edgefield County Sheriff’s Department; ERVIN J. MAYE, Assistant Solicitor, sued in their individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1887-6-10AK)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert W. Garrett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Garrett appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Garrett v. Collier, No. CA-02-1887-6-10AK
(D.S.C. July 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garrett v. Collier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-collier-ca4-2002.