Garrett v. Burns

Fourth Circuit

Garrett v. Burns

375 F. App'x 360

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. No. 09-2396·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Garrett v. Bums, No. 2:09-cv-00558-RAJ-FB S (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Garrett v. Bums, No. 2:09-cv-00558-RAJ-FB S (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Garrett v. Burns, 375 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

375 F. App'x 360 (Garrett v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.