Garrett v. Booth
Opinion
The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in this suit on an oral contract and a judgment was entered accordingly. The single enumeration of error concerns the correctness of the trial court’s ruling in not admitting the testimony of defendánt as to statements made by a third party concerning the oral contract. There was no error. In order to gain admission of these declarations, defendant had to [177]*177show that the third party was plaintiffs agent at the time. Colt Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Ga. App. 427 (5) (120 SE 792). There was no evidence that the declarant was plaintiffs agent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
230 S.E.2d 341 (Garrett v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.