Garrett & Sons v. Underwood
27 S.E. 665, 102 Ga. 558, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 567
Opinion
Where á defendant, imprisoned under an action of trover where bail was required, petitioned the judge of the court in which the suit was pending, for his discharge, and it satisfactorily appeared that he [559]*559was unable to produce the property or to give security for the eventual condemnation money, there was no error in discharging the defendant on his own recognizance and awarding the cost of the proceeding against the plaintiff. Ragan v. Chicago Packing and Provision Co., 93 Ga. 712.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garrett & Sons v. Underwood, 27 S.E. 665, 102 Ga. 558, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 567 (Ga. 1897).
27 S.E. 665 (Garrett & Sons v. Underwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marsh v. Ben H. Fletcher Co.
88 S.E. 416 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Thurman v. Smith
85 S.E. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)