Garrett, Decarlos Montray
This text of Garrett, Decarlos Montray (Garrett, Decarlos Montray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-60,248-03 & WR-60,248-04
EX PARTE DECARLOS MONTRAY GARRETT, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 886344-B & 870048-B IN THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment
for ninety-nine and forty-five years. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Garrett
v. State, No. 01-02-00320-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 30, 2003) (not designated for
publication); Garrett v. State, No. 01-02-00321-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 15, 2003)
(not designated for publication). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the
county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that the State failed to disclose exculpatory and
impeachment evidence, the State relied on false testimony, and trial counsel was ineffective for not 2
investigating exculpatory and impeachment evidence. On February 27, 2019, we remanded these
applications and directed the trial court to make further findings of fact and conclusions of law and
to order trial counsel and the State to file responses. On remand, the trial court made further findings
and conclusions, but nothing in the supplemental record indicates that trial counsel and the trial
prosecutor filed responses.
The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel and the trial prosecutor to respond to the above
claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
After reviewing trial counsel’s and the trial prosecutor’s responses, the trial court shall make
further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether: (1) the State failed to disclose favorable
impeachment and exculpatory evidence that was material to Applicant’s conviction in cause number
870048 and his punishment in cause number 886344; (2) the State relied on false testimony that was
material to Applicant’s conviction in cause number 870048 and his punishment in cause number
886344; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective for not investigating impeachment and exculpatory
evidence. If a copy of the surveillance video in cause number 870048 exists, the trial court shall
order the district clerk to forward it to this Court as a supplement. The trial court may make any
other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from 3
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 29, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garrett, Decarlos Montray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-decarlos-montray-texcrimapp-2020.