Garret v. . Trent
4 S.E.2d 319, 216 N.C. 162, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 120
Opinion
There is an absence of any finding of the fact by the court that the defendant had meritorious defenses, and for this reason the judgments should not have been set aside. Cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N. C., 5; Hooks v. Neighbors, 211 N. C., 382.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garret v. . Trent, 4 S.E.2d 319, 216 N.C. 162, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 120 (N.C. 1939).
4 S.E.2d 319 (Garret v. . Trent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Craver v. . Spaugh
38 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)