Garred v. Garred

275 P. 2, 51 Nev. 335, 1929 Nev. LEXIS 20
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1929·No. 2852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial in the divorce action of U. A. Garred, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth H. Garred, Defendant.

After consideration of the entire record, the motion to dismiss the appeal from the order must be sustained for the following reason: The record on appeal contains no bill of exceptions settled and allowed by the judge or court or by stipulation of the parties within the time required by the statute, or at all. Stats. 1923, p. 163, c. 97. See Barbash v. Pitt, 48 Nev. 108, 227 P. 1018, 233 P. 844, 236 P. 1101; Shirk v. Palmer, 48 Nev. 451, 232 P. 1083, 236 P. 678, 239 P. 1000; Water Co. of *336 Tonopah v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co., 49 Nev. 172, 241 P. 1079; Markwell v. Gray, 50 Nev. 427, 265 P. 705.

Finding no error upon the face of the judgment roll, the judgment appealed from- is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garred v. Garred, 275 P. 2, 51 Nev. 335, 1929 Nev. LEXIS 20 (Neb. 1929).

275 P. 2 (Garred v. Garred) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blouin v. Blouin
206 P.2d 608 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1949)