Garratt v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
This text of 965 P.2d 1022 (Garratt v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven D. GARRATT, Petitioner on Review,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for Petitioner on Review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
No appearance contra.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, DURHAM, KULONGOSKI and LEESON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. Board of Parole, 327 Or. 485, 964 P.2d 990 (1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
965 P.2d 1022, 327 Or. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garratt-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-or-1998.