Garrard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrard v. State

268 So. 3d 836

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2019·No. Case No. 2D18-1301·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written judgment and sentence. See Nielson v. State, 984 So.2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; see also Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written judgment and sentence. See Nielson v. State, 984 So.2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; see also Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Garrard v. State, 268 So. 3d 836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

268 So. 3d 836 (Garrard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related