Garrard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garrard v. State

268 So. 3d 836

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2019

DocketCase No. 2D18-1301

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 836 (Garrard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrard v. State, 268 So. 3d 836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written judgment and sentence. See Nielson v. State, 984 So.2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; see also Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written judgment and sentence. See Nielson v. State, 984 So.2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; see also Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrard-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack